lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZS4BJj1b-Fa6v9=0sRyXncmtGN_R0oymOF24bheE7Shg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:59:50 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, 
	Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, 
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi
 session attach

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:47 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding support to attach program in uprobe session mode
> with bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi function.
>
> Adding session bool to bpf_uprobe_multi_opts struct that allows
> to load and attach the bpf program via uprobe session.
> the attachment to create uprobe multi session.
>
> Also adding new program loader section that allows:
>   SEC("uprobe.session/bpf_fentry_test*")
>
> and loads/attaches uprobe program as uprobe session.
>
> Adding sleepable hook (uprobe.session.s) as well.
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c    |  1 +
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index 2a4c71501a17..becdfa701c75 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ int bpf_link_create(int prog_fd, int target_fd,
>                         return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
>                 break;
>         case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI:
> +       case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
>                 attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.flags, 0);
>                 attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.cnt = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.cnt, 0);
>                 attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.path = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.path, 0));
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index faac1c79840d..a2bc5bea7ea3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -9442,8 +9442,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
>         SEC_DEF("kprobe.session+",      KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe_session),
>         SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi+",        KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
>         SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi+",     KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> +       SEC_DEF("uprobe.session+",      KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
>         SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi.s+",      KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
>         SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi.s+",   KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> +       SEC_DEF("uprobe.session.s+",    KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
>         SEC_DEF("ksyscall+",            KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
>         SEC_DEF("kretsyscall+",         KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
>         SEC_DEF("usdt+",                KPROBE, 0, SEC_USDT, attach_usdt),
> @@ -11765,7 +11767,9 @@ static int attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, stru
>                 ret = 0;
>                 break;
>         case 3:
> +               opts.session = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uprobe.session");
>                 opts.retprobe = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uretprobe.multi");
> +
>                 *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, -1, binary_path, func_name, &opts);
>                 ret = libbpf_get_error(*link);
>                 break;
> @@ -12014,10 +12018,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>         const unsigned long *ref_ctr_offsets = NULL, *offsets = NULL;
>         LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, lopts);
>         unsigned long *resolved_offsets = NULL;
> +       enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>         int err = 0, link_fd, prog_fd;
>         struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
>         char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
>         char full_path[PATH_MAX];
> +       bool retprobe, session;
>         const __u64 *cookies;
>         const char **syms;
>         size_t cnt;
> @@ -12088,12 +12094,20 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>                 offsets = resolved_offsets;
>         }
>
> +       retprobe = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false);
> +       session  = OPTS_GET(opts, session, false);
> +
> +       if (retprobe && session)
> +               return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);

Hey Jiri,

Coverity says that we are leaking offsets (resolved_offsets) here.
Please send a fix, thanks.

> +
> +       attach_type = session ? BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION : BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
> +
>         lopts.uprobe_multi.path = path;
>         lopts.uprobe_multi.offsets = offsets;
>         lopts.uprobe_multi.ref_ctr_offsets = ref_ctr_offsets;
>         lopts.uprobe_multi.cookies = cookies;
>         lopts.uprobe_multi.cnt = cnt;
> -       lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false) ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
> +       lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = retprobe ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
>
>         if (pid == 0)
>                 pid = getpid();
> @@ -12107,7 +12121,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>         }
>         link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
>
> -       link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, &lopts);
> +       link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, attach_type, &lopts);
>         if (link_fd < 0) {
>                 err = -errno;
>                 pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to attach multi-uprobe: %s\n",
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index 91484303849c..b2ce3a72b11d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -577,10 +577,12 @@ struct bpf_uprobe_multi_opts {
>         size_t cnt;
>         /* create return uprobes */
>         bool retprobe;
> +       /* create session kprobes */
> +       bool session;
>         size_t :0;
>  };
>
> -#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field retprobe
> +#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field session
>
>  /**
>   * @brief **bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi()** attaches a BPF program
> --
> 2.47.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ