[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfF=jrJNMcJ=yBPp_=atEt+isrJEDUwgx6gaBeQP+H=hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:12:08 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: altera: Add missed base and label initialisations
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 1:30 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> During conversion driver to modern APIs the base field initial value
> of the GPIO chip was moved from -1 to 0, which triggers a warning.
> Add missed base initialisation as it was in the original code.
>
> Also initialise the GPIO chip label correctly.
>
> Fixes: 50dded8d9d62 ("gpio: altera: Drop legacy-of-mm-gpiochip.h header")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Can be folded into the mentioned change, up to you and sorry for missing
> these in the first place.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> index 039fef26546e..73e660c5e38a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,11 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> altera_gc->gc.set = altera_gpio_set;
> altera_gc->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> altera_gc->gc.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + altera_gc->gc.base = -1;
This does in fact fix commit 50dded8d9d62 ("gpio: altera: Drop
legacy-of-mm-gpiochip.h header") and should go together with it
upstream.
> +
> + altera_gc->gc.label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pfw", dev_fwnode(dev));
> + if (!altera_gc->gc.label)
> + return -ENOMEM;
This is a separate thing and I would argue it's not even a fix per se.
Lack of label doesn't make it entirely impossible to use the chip. I'm
willing to send it as a fix but please make it a separate commit as it
doesn't fix anything from 50dded8d9d62.
The commit message for it could also use some explanation why it's
better to set label (so that the chip will not figure as "unknown" in
the kernel).
Bart
>
> altera_gc->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(altera_gc->regs))
> --
> 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists