[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe670aff-461f-417f-a9b7-7b714e84b5e2@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:54:52 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Rex Nie <rexnie3@...il.com>, ericvh@...nel.org, lucho@...kov.net,
asmadeus@...ewreck.org, linux_oss@...debyte.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p/fs: Different branch return the same value
Le 16/11/2024 à 16:26, Rex Nie a écrit :
> The same code is executed when the condition ret < 0 is true or false.
> Remove the if branch and just return v9fs_init_inode_cache(). This
> does not change the semantics of the original code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rex Nie <rexnie3@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/9p/v9fs.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/v9fs.c b/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> index 281a1ed03a04..ee0a374e0d9d 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> @@ -661,12 +661,7 @@ static void v9fs_destroy_inode_cache(void)
>
> static int v9fs_cache_register(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = v9fs_init_inode_cache();
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - return ret;
> + return v9fs_init_inode_cache();
> }
>
> static void v9fs_cache_unregister(void)
Hi,
a similar patch has already been sent.
See [1], which is the v2 of the patch and goes one step further.
CJ
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20241107095756.10261-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists