linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI/pwrctl: Create pwrctl devices only if at least one power supply is present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241116184103.GD890334@rocinante>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:41:03 +0900
From: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>,
	stable+noautosel@...nel.org,
	Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI/pwrctl: Create pwrctl devices only if at
 least one power supply is present

Hello,

[...]
> > > > +bool of_pci_is_supply_present(struct device_node *np)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct property *prop;
> > > > +     char *supply;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (!np)
> > > > +             return false;
> > >
> > > Why do we need to test !np here?  It should always be non-NULL.
> > >
> > 
> > Right, I think this can be dropped. We check for the OF node in the
> > function above.
> > 
> 
> I think it was a leftover that I didn't cleanup. But I do plan to move this API
> to drivers/of once 6.13-rc1 is out. So even if it didn't get dropped now, I will
> do it later.

I removed the NULL check directly on the branch.  Thank you!

	Krzysztof