[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzjyVgnEUOYknN1k@x1>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:28:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Make leader sampling test work without
branch event
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:54:43AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 8:16 AM James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Arm a57 only has speculative branch events so this test fails there. The
> > test doesn't depend on branch instructions so change it to instructions
> > which is pretty much guaranteed to be everywhere. The
> > test_branch_counter() test above already tests for the existence of the
> > branches event and skips if its not present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists