[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74ae05a9-6fff-4088-a46c-0a68a5b64614@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:57:03 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: adc: ad4000: Use device specific timing for
SPI transfers
On 11/18/24 12:53 PM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> The SPI transfers for AD4020, AD4021, and AD4022 have slightly different
> timing specifications. Use device specific timing constraints to set SPI
> transfer parameters. While tweaking time constraints, remove time related
> defines including unused AD4000_TQUIET1_NS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
> ---
...
> +/*
> + * Same timing specifications for all of AD4000, AD4001, ..., AD4008, AD4010,
> + * ADAQ4001, and ADAQ4003.
> + */
> +static const struct ad4000_time_spec ad4000_t_spec = AD4000_TSPEC(320, 60);
> +
> +/* AD4020, AD4021, AD4022 */
> +static const struct ad4000_time_spec ad4020_t_spec = AD4000_TSPEC(350, 60);
I actually liked the way you did it in v1 better. This makes it harder to
see which number is which.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists