linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 6.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <366r6ss5-2qo9-or0p-28qo-634892op88ns@xreary.bet>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:37:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 6.13

On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> Linus,
> 
> please pull from
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git tags/hid-for-linus-2024111801
> 
> to receive HID subsystem queue for 6.13 merge window.
> 
> Please note: there is one SHA that you might notice was not present in 
> linux-next, and that's e8a0581914bd ("HID: multitouch: make mt_set_mode() 
> less cryptic").
> 
> The reason for this is that there was a hiccup when merging this patch 
> originally, and the topic branch was based on some random state of the 
> for-next branch, so it contained a lot of unrelated churn. And I've 
> noticed that only now, when preparing the pull request. The end result is 
> identical on a code level, but I didn't want to send you the branch with 
> git merge history that makes no sense [1], so I've created [2] instead, 
> and that's the one present in this pull request.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git/log/?h=for-6.13/multitouch

[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hid/hid.git/log/?h=for-6.13/multitouch-v2

is of course the missing reference.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs