lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241118132147.1614-1-liqiang64@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:21:46 +0800
From: liqiang <liqiang64@...wei.com>
To: <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <luanjianhai@...wei.com>,
	<zhangxuzhou4@...wei.com>, <dengguangxing@...wei.com>,
	<gaochao24@...wei.com>, <liqiang64@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/1] net/smc: Optimize rmbs/sndbufs lock

This patch changes the global lock used by the buf_desc linked list
array in the smc link group to a smaller granularity, which can
reduce competition between links using different bufsizes and make
them perform better.

After applying this patch, the main scenarios that generate benefits
are as follows: multiple threads use different socket buffers
(sk->sk_sndbuf/sk_rcvbuf) to establish connections concurrently.

I constructed the above scenario and compared the performance of
socket buffer distribution in 4 sizes when multi-threaded in
parallel (tested using nginx/wrk):

On server:
smc_run nginx

On client:
smc_run wrk -t <2~128> -c 200 -H "Connection: close" http://127.0.0.1

+-------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+~
|conns/qps          |  -t 2  | -t 4   | -t 8   | -t 16  | -t 32  |
+-------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+~
|loopback-ism origin|6824.01 |9011.71 |11571.07|12179.72|11576.88|
+-------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+~
|loopback-ism after |7280.63 |9508.53 |13173.27|16368.93|14664.51|
+-------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+~

~--------+--------+
  -t 64  | -t 128 |
~--------+--------+
 11080.98|11909.36|
~--------+--------+
 14664.51|13112.89|
~--------+--------+

Test environment:
QEMU emulator version 1.5.3 @ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz

liqiang (1):
  Separate locks for rmbs/sndbufs linked lists of different lengths

 net/smc/smc_core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 net/smc/smc_core.h |  9 +++---
 net/smc/smc_llc.c  | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ