linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241118144117.88483-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:41:15 +0200
From: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock

Removed hba->clk_gating.active_reqs check from ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy
function to separate clock gating logic from general device busy checks.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index e338867bc96c..be5fe2407382 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -258,10 +258,15 @@ ufs_get_desired_pm_lvl_for_dev_link_state(enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode dev_state,
 	return UFS_PM_LVL_0;
 }
 
+static bool ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	return hba->outstanding_tasks || hba->active_uic_cmd ||
+	       hba->uic_async_done;
+}
+
 static bool ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
-	return (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->outstanding_reqs || hba->outstanding_tasks ||
-		hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done);
+	return hba->outstanding_reqs || ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(hba);
 }
 
 static const struct ufs_dev_quirk ufs_fixups[] = {
@@ -1943,7 +1948,9 @@ static void ufshcd_gate_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		goto rel_lock;
 	}
 
-	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) || hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL)
+	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) ||
+	    hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL ||
+	    hba->clk_gating.active_reqs)
 		goto rel_lock;
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
@@ -1999,8 +2006,7 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 
 	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended ||
 	    hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL ||
-	    hba->outstanding_tasks || !hba->clk_gating.is_initialized ||
-	    hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done ||
+	    ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(hba) || !hba->clk_gating.is_initialized ||
 	    hba->clk_gating.state == CLKS_OFF)
 		return;
 
@@ -8221,7 +8227,9 @@ static void ufshcd_rtc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	hba = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct ufs_hba, ufs_rtc_update_work);
 
 	 /* Update RTC only when there are no requests in progress and UFSHCI is operational */
-	if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) && hba->ufshcd_state == UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL)
+	if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) &&
+	    hba->ufshcd_state == UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL &&
+	    !hba->clk_gating.active_reqs)
 		ufshcd_update_rtc(hba);
 
 	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba) && hba->dev_info.rtc_update_period)
-- 
2.25.1