[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241118144624.GA27795@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:46:25 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/17] iommu: generalize the batched sync after map
interface
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 03:46:50PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> For the upcoming IOVA-based DMA API we want to use the interface batch the
> sync after mapping multiple entries from dma-iommu without having a
> scatterlist.
>
> For that move more sanity checks from the callers into __iommu_map and
> make that function available outside of iommu.c as iommu_map_nosync.
>
> Add a wrapper for the map_sync as iommu_sync_map so that callers don't
> need to poke into the methods directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> include/linux/iommu.h | 4 +++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
I was a little worried that exposing iommu_map_nosync() directly could
expose driver bugs where the range being sync'd was assumed to be mapped,
but I couldn't spot anything obvious from a quick check, so:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists