[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZztmlT8mBb2NIJ1z@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:08:53 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
Ilpo J�rvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Klara Modin <klarasmodin@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danil Rybakov <danilrybakov249@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>
Subject: Re: platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device
probe
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 18-Nov-24 4:55 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> Agreed, still I'm not sure how I feel about us hiding the previously unhidden P2SB.
>
> OTOH I guess it may have only been unhidden in the BIOS to make the hack they
> are using possible in the first place.
Yeah, sounds like this, because the whole dance with this hiding-unhiding
is due to the Windows yellow bang, due to no driver for the thingy, and
scared users. Reference BIOS should hide it by default when giving a control
to the bootloader and OS.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists