[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABdmKX2203KMx5P2x02C=YFCtiR6b5u2JzLS9SbPRh08FzqAKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:13:54 -0800
From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Fix __dma_buf_debugfs_list_del argument for !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 1:15 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 17/11/2024 17:03, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > The arguments for __dma_buf_debugfs_list_del do not match for both the
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS case and the !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS case. The !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > case should take a struct dma_buf *, but it's currently struct file *.
> > This can lead to the build error:
> >
> > error: passing argument 1 of ‘__dma_buf_debugfs_list_del’ from
> > incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >
> > dma-buf.c:63:53: note: expected ‘struct file *’ but argument is of
> > type ‘struct dma_buf *’
> > 63 | static void __dma_buf_debugfs_list_del(struct file *file)
> >
> > Fixes: bfc7bc539392 ("dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS")
> > Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 8892bc701a66..afb8c1c50107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void __dma_buf_debugfs_list_add(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > -static void __dma_buf_debugfs_list_del(struct file *file)
> > +static void __dma_buf_debugfs_list_del(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> > {
> > }
> > #endif
>
> Huh I wonder how this sneaked by until now.. thanks for fixing!
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
Thanks Tvrtko. Upstream there is currently only the one use where it's
called with a void pointer which doesn't generate the error, but
KernelCI caught the problem on an Android branch where it's also
called with a dma_buf pointer:
https://dashboard.kernelci.org/tree/5a4c93e2f794001a5efa13c0dec931235240d384/build/maestro:6737e60d1a48e7821930345d?tableFilter=%7B%22buildsTable%22%3A%22invalid%22%2C%22bootsTable%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22testsTable%22%3A%22all%22%7D&origin=maestro¤tPageTab=treeDetails.builds&diffFilter=%7B%7D&treeInfo=%7B%22gitBranch%22%3A%22android16-6.12%22%2C%22gitUrl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fandroid.googlesource.com%2Fkernel%2Fcommon%22%2C%22treeName%22%3A%22android%22%2C%22commitName%22%3A%22ASB-2024-11-05_16-6.12-370-g5a4c93e2f7940%22%2C%22headCommitHash%22%3A%225a4c93e2f794001a5efa13c0dec931235240d384%22%7D&intervalInDays=7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists