[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49526254-546e-41e8-afb1-14aadeaa391b@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:46:56 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Subject: Re: regmap I3C support
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 08:35:04PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/14/24 09:26, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Right, so the fact that I3C depends on I2C deals with a lot of the
> > problems that plague the I2C/SPI combination. Ugh. I guess the helper
> > should be OK and there's not much doing for I2C/SPI.
> It looks like we can use
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGMAP_I3C)) {
> regmap = devm_regmap_init_i3c(i3cdev, &tmp108_regmap_config);
> if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
> "Failed to register i3c regmap\n");
> ...
> }
> even if a stub function is not available as long as there is an external
> declaration.
> I don't really like it, but it turns out that this kind of code is already used
> elsewhere in the kernel. It looks like dead code elimination can now assumed
> to be available when building kernel code. We live and learn.
Ah, that solves that problem then I guess?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists