lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173204294600.75287.4594724569290758580.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:02:26 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, 
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom-labibb-regulator:
 document the pmi8950 labibb regulator

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:04:26 +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Document the pmi8950 labibb regulator with the pmi8998 compatible
> as fallback since they share the same hardware settings.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom-labibb-regulator: document the pmi8950 labibb regulator
      commit: 5262bcbb41d526f944a91a6a6c88dfb6fba3889b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ