[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90e5e7d6-89c5-4f0f-9a9d-34873fc498ad@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:53:39 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan
<tariqt@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5/core: remove mlx5_core_cq.tasklet_ctx.priv field
On 11/18/2024 8:24 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> The priv field in mlx5_core_cq's tasklet_ctx struct points to the
> mlx5_eq_tasklet tasklet_ctx field of the CQ's mlx5_eq_comp. mlx5_core_cq
> already stores a pointer to the EQ. Use this eq pointer to get a pointer
> to the tasklet_ctx with no additional pointer dereferences and no void *
> casts. Remove the now unused priv field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
> ---
This needs to tag net-next, as it doesn't fix any user-visible bug.
Additionally, net-next just closed for preparation of 6.13, and this
will need to wait until it re-opens on Dec 2nd.
The code change itself seems reasonable to me, saving an otherwise
unnecessary pointer.
When you resend it when the window is open, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Thanks,
Jake
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cq.c | 5 ++---
> include/linux/mlx5/cq.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cq.c
> index 1fd403713baf..dc5a291f0993 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cq.c
> @@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ void mlx5_cq_tasklet_cb(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>
> static void mlx5_add_cq_to_tasklet(struct mlx5_core_cq *cq,
> struct mlx5_eqe *eqe)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct mlx5_eq_tasklet *tasklet_ctx = cq->tasklet_ctx.priv;
> + struct mlx5_eq_tasklet *tasklet_ctx = &cq->eq->tasklet_ctx;
> bool schedule_tasklet = false;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tasklet_ctx->lock, flags);
> /* When migrating CQs between EQs will be implemented, please note
> * that you need to sync this point. It is possible that
> @@ -117,18 +117,17 @@ int mlx5_create_cq(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_cq *cq,
> return err;
>
> cq->cqn = MLX5_GET(create_cq_out, out, cqn);
> cq->cons_index = 0;
> cq->arm_sn = 0;
> + /* assuming CQ will be deleted before the EQ */
> cq->eq = eq;
> cq->uid = MLX5_GET(create_cq_in, in, uid);
> refcount_set(&cq->refcount, 1);
> init_completion(&cq->free);
> if (!cq->comp)
> cq->comp = mlx5_add_cq_to_tasklet;
> - /* assuming CQ will be deleted before the EQ */
> - cq->tasklet_ctx.priv = &eq->tasklet_ctx;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cq->tasklet_ctx.list);
>
> /* Add to comp EQ CQ tree to recv comp events */
> err = mlx5_eq_add_cq(&eq->core, cq);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/cq.h b/include/linux/mlx5/cq.h
> index 991526039ccb..cd034ea0ee34 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/cq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/cq.h
> @@ -53,11 +53,10 @@ struct mlx5_core_cq {
> struct mlx5_rsc_debug *dbg;
> int pid;
> struct {
> struct list_head list;
> void (*comp)(struct mlx5_core_cq *cq, struct mlx5_eqe *eqe);
> - void *priv;
> } tasklet_ctx;
> int reset_notify_added;
> struct list_head reset_notify;
> struct mlx5_eq_comp *eq;
> u16 uid;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists