[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzwH77QE/Ch9+evD@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:37:19 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: guanjing <guanjing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, dxu@...uu.xyz,
antony.antony@...unet.com, cupertino.miranda@...cle.com,
asavkov@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/bpf: fix application of sizeof to pointer
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:18:38AM +0800, guanjing wrote:
> sizeof when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the size of
> the pointer.
>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c:678:41-47: ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer
>
> The proper fix in this particular case is to code sizeof(*gopt)
> instead of sizeof(gopt).
>
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Fixes: 5ddafcc377f9 ("selftests/bpf: Fix a few tests for GCC related warnings.")
> Signed-off-by: guanjing <guanjing@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> index 32127f1cd687..3a437cdc5c15 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ int ip6geneve_set_tunnel(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> gopt->length = 2; /* 4-byte multiple */
> *(int *) &gopt->opt_data = bpf_htonl(0xfeedbeef);
>
> - ret = bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt(skb, gopt, sizeof(gopt));
> + ret = bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt(skb, gopt, sizeof(*gopt));
Good catch!
I think sizeof(local_gopt) is better, to align with geneve_set_tunnel(),
what do you think?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists