[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS8PR04MB8676DFD33B926A2EC57577CC8C202@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:38:30 +0000
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com"
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Frank Li
<frank.li@....com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI: imx6: Add ref clock for i.MX95 PCIe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hongxing Zhu
> Sent: 2024年11月18日 10:59
> To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de; bhelgaas@...gle.com; lpieralisi@...nel.org;
> kw@...ux.com; robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; Frank Li <frank.li@....com>; s.hauer@...gutronix.de;
> festevam@...il.com; imx@...ts.linux.dev; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI: imx6: Add ref clock for i.MX95 PCIe
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > Sent: 2024年11月15日 14:38
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> > lpieralisi@...nel.org; kw@...ux.com; robh@...nel.org;
> > krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org; shawnguo@...nel.org; Frank Li
> > <frank.li@....com>; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> > imx@...ts.linux.dev; kernel@...gutronix.de; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI: imx6: Add ref clock for i.MX95 PCIe
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:06:02PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > Add "ref" clock to enable reference clock. To avoid the DT
> > > compatibility, i.MX95 REF clock might be optional.
> >
> > Your wording is not correct. Perhaps you wanted to say, "To avoid
> > breaking DT backwards compatibility"?
> >
> Yes, you're right. Thanks.
>
> > > Replace the
> > > devm_clk_bulk_get() by devm_clk_bulk_get_optional() to fetch
> > > i.MX95 PCIe optional clocks in driver.
> > >
> > > If use external clock, ref clock should point to external reference.
> > >
> > > If use internal clock, CREF_EN in LAST_TO_REG controls reference
> > > output, which implement in drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx95-blk-ctl.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > index 808d1f105417..bc8567677a67 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum imx_pcie_variants {
> > > #define IMX_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_SERDES BIT(6)
> > > #define IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORT_64BIT BIT(7)
> > > #define IMX_PCIE_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_FIXUP BIT(8)
> > > +#define IMX_PCIE_FLAG_CUSTOM_PME_TURNOFF BIT(9)
> > >
> > > #define imx_check_flag(pci, val) (pci->drvdata->flags & val)
> > >
> > > @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ struct imx_pcie_drvdata {
> > > const char *gpr;
> > > const char * const *clk_names;
> > > const u32 clks_cnt;
> > > + const u32 clks_optional_cnt;
> > > const u32 ltssm_off;
> > > const u32 ltssm_mask;
> > > const u32 mode_off[IMX_PCIE_MAX_INSTANCES]; @@ -1278,9
> +1280,8
> > @@
> > > static int imx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct device_node *np;
> > > struct resource *dbi_base;
> > > struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > > - int ret;
> > > + int ret, i, req_cnt;
> > > u16 val;
> > > - int i;
> > >
> > > imx_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*imx_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (!imx_pcie)
> > > @@ -1330,7 +1331,10 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > > imx_pcie->clks[i].id = imx_pcie->drvdata->clk_names[i];
> > >
> > > /* Fetch clocks */
> > > - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt,
> > imx_pcie->clks);
> > > + req_cnt = imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt -
> > imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_optional_cnt;
> > > + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, req_cnt, imx_pcie->clks);
> > > + ret |= devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev,
> > imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_optional_cnt,
> > > + imx_pcie->clks + req_cnt);
> >
> > Why do you need to use 'clk_bulk' API to get a single reference clock?
> > Just use devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref")
> It's easier to add more optional clks in future. I can change to use
> devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref") here if you insistent.
Since the clock fetch is not distinguished by platforms explicitly.
devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref") can be used only when i.MX95 specification
is added.
- ret |= devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_optional_cnt,
- imx_pcie->clks + req_cnt);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ for (i = 0; i < imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_optional_cnt; i++) {
+ imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt + i].clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev,
+ imx_pcie->drvdata->clk_names[req_cnt + i]);
+ if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt + i].clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt + i].clk);
+ }
Or
- ret |= devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, imx_pcie->drvdata->clks_optional_cnt,
- imx_pcie->clks + req_cnt);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ if (imx_pcie->drvdata->variant == IMX95) {
+ imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt].clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ref");
+ if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt].clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->clks[req_cnt].clk);
+ }
Which one is better of these two changes?
Or
To keep codes simple and aligned, how about to keep the original one?
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
>
> >
> > And who is going to supply the reference clock in the absence of this
> > clockn in DT?
> When the "preview" version firmware is used, this clock is gated on in default.
> In this case, hiso-blk-ctrl would gated on this clock in default state.
>
> Best Regards
> Richard Zhu
> >
> > - Mani
> >
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1480,6 +1484,7 @@ static const char * const imx8mm_clks[] =
> > > {"pcie_bus", "pcie", "pcie_aux"}; static const char * const
> > > imx8mq_clks[] = {"pcie_bus", "pcie", "pcie_phy", "pcie_aux"};
> > > static const char * const imx6sx_clks[] = {"pcie_bus", "pcie",
> > > "pcie_phy", "pcie_inbound_axi"}; static const char * const
> > > imx8q_clks[] = {"mstr", "slv", "dbi"};
> > > +static const char * const imx95_clks[] = {"pcie_bus", "pcie",
> > > +"pcie_phy", "pcie_aux", "ref"};
> > >
> > > static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
> > > [IMX6Q] = {
> > > @@ -1592,9 +1597,11 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata
> > > drvdata[] =
> > {
> > > },
> > > [IMX95] = {
> > > .variant = IMX95,
> > > - .flags = IMX_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_SERDES,
> > > - .clk_names = imx8mq_clks,
> > > - .clks_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mq_clks),
> > > + .flags = IMX_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_SERDES |
> > > + IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND,
> > > + .clk_names = imx95_clks,
> > > + .clks_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(imx95_clks),
> > > + .clks_optional_cnt = 1,
> > > .ltssm_off = IMX95_PE0_GEN_CTRL_3,
> > > .ltssm_mask = IMX95_PCIE_LTSSM_EN,
> > > .mode_off[0] = IMX95_PE0_GEN_CTRL_1,
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >
> >
> > --
> > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists