lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c1a67a1ec7b4b1eb4965575b625a628@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:22:46 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
CC: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
	<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
        Ping-Ke Shih
	<pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 4/4] rtase: Add defines for hardware version id

> 
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:08:28PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> > Add defines for hardware version id.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h      |  5 ++++-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> The patch is addressed to the "net" tree, but "Fixes" tag is missing.
> Also, the patch does not look like a bugfix it's rather an improvement of coding
> style with no functional changes. That's why I doubt it should go to the "net"
> tree.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal

Hi Michal,

This patch introduces multiple defines for hardware version IDs, rather
than addressing any issues related to the function logic, which is why it
does not include a "Fixes:" tag. The reason for isolating this change in a
separate patch is to maintain a "single patch, single purpose" approach.
Additionally, these defines will be used in other patches within the same
patch set, which is why they are included in this patch set as a whole.

Justin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ