[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a77f16b-d637-40b4-bf47-a8236729a0ca@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:31:46 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP
On 19.11.24 17:12, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2024, at 10:29, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>>> +/* Split a multi-block free page into its individual pageblocks. */
>>> +static void split_large_buddy(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>>> + unsigned long pfn, int order, fpi_t fpi)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long end = pfn + (1 << order);
>>> +
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order));
>>> + /* Caller removed page from freelist, buddy info cleared! */
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageBuddy(page));
>>> +
>>> + if (order > pageblock_order)
>>> + order = pageblock_order;
>>> +
>>> + while (pfn != end) {
>>> + int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
>>> +
>>> + __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, mt, fpi);
>>> + pfn += 1 << order;
>>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> stumbling over this while digging through the code ....
>>
>>> +
>>> static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned int order,
>>> fpi_t fpi_flags)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> - int migratetype;
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
>>> - migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
>>> - __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, fpi_flags);
>>
>> This change is rather undesired:
>>
>> via __free_pages_core()->__free_pages_ok() we can easily end up here with order=MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
>
> Do you have a concrete example? PMD THP on x86_64 is pageblock_order.
> We do not have PMD level mTHP yet. Any other possible source?
>
>>
>> What your new code will do is split this perfectly reasonable MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk via split_large_buddy() into pageblock-sized chunks, and let the buddy merging logic undo our unnecessary splitting.
>>
>> Is there a way to avoid this and just process the whole MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk like we used to?
>
> Probably split_large_buddy() can check the migratetypes of the to-be-freed
> page, if order > pageblock_order. If all migratetypes are the same, the page
> can be freed at MAX_PAGE_ORDER, otherwise pageblock_order.
Thinking about this: why do we care about the migratetype?
We only have to fallback to pageblocks if any pageblock is
"MIGRATE_ISOLATE" (and maybe MIGRATE_CMA), but not all. Otherwise, we
can just ignore the migratetype (or rather overwrite it)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists