linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document rb8/ride/ride-r3 on QCS9075

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fc564e4-4bb5-4529-a38b-88d93684805b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:43:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wasim Nazir <quic_wasimn@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document rb8/ride/ride-r3
 on QCS9075

On 19/11/2024 18:49, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> qcs9075 rb8, ride & ride-r3 boards are based on QCS9075 SoC.
> 
> QCS9075 is compatible IoT-industrial grade variant of SA8775p SoC
> without safety monitorng feature of SAfety-IsLand subsystem.

SA or Sa?
Also some typos above.

> This subsystem continues to supports other features like built-in
> self-test, error-detection, reset-handling, etc.

Which subsystem? How does it matter for the board? Drop all marketing
stuff from here and rather explain why this is not related to qcs9100.
We had quite a lot of talks and I am surprised seeing this without any
earlier references.




Best regards,
Krzysztof