[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241120170232.flllyqcycsrsk6cj@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:32:32 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>,
stable+noautosel@...nel.org,
Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI/pwrctl: Ensure that the pwrctl drivers are
probed before the PCI client drivers
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:10:47AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 01:24:53PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> >
> > As per the kernel device driver model, pwrctl device is the supplier for
> > the PCI device. But the device link that enforces the supplier-consumer
> > relationship is created inside the pwrctl driver currently. Due to this,
> > the driver model doesn't prevent probing of the PCI client drivers before
> > probing the corresponding pwrctl drivers. This may lead to a race condition
> > if the PCI device was already powered on by the bootloader (before the
> > pwrctl driver).
>
> > + * Create a device link between the PCI device and pwrctl device (if
> > + * exists). This ensures that the pwrctl drivers are probed before the
> > + * PCI client drivers.
> > + */
> > + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
> > + if (pdev) {
> > + if (!device_link_add(&dev->dev, &pdev->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER))
> > + pci_err(dev, "failed to add device link between %s and %s\n",
> > + dev_name(&dev->dev), pdev->name);
>
> This prints the name for "dev" twice (once by pci_err(dev) and again
> from dev_name(&dev->dev)). Is it helpful to see it twice here?
Hmm, not very much. It could be reworded as below:
pci_err(dev, "failed to link: %s\n", pdev->name);
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists