[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241120181238.n3xwpd6uticlaw4a@desk>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:12:38 -0800
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, amit.shah@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
sandipan.das@....com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Babu.Moger@....com, david.kaplan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with
eIBRS+retpoline
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 11:27:50PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> eIBRS protects against RSB underflow/poisoning attacks. Adding
> retpoline to the mix doesn't change that. Retpoline has a balanced
> CALL/RET anyway.
>
> So the current full RSB filling on VMEXIT with eIBRS+retpoline is
> overkill. Disable it (or do the VMEXIT_LITE mitigation if needed).
>
> Suggested-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists