linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools: PCI: Fix several incorrect format specifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241120202216.GA2347727@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:22:16 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, kishon@...nel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: PCI: Fix several incorrect format specifiers

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 05:09:24PM +0800, Luo Yifan wrote:
> Make a minor change to eliminate static checker warnings. Fix several
> incorrect format specifiers that misused signed and unsigned versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com>

Applied with Mani's reviewed-by to pci/misc for v6.13, thanks!

> ---
>  tools/pci/pcitest.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/pci/pcitest.c b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> index 470258009..7b530d838 100644
> --- a/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  
>  	if (test->msinum > 0 && test->msinum <= 32) {
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_MSI, test->msinum);
> -		fprintf(stdout, "MSI%d:\t\t", test->msinum);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "MSI%u:\t\t", test->msinum);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
>  		else
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  
>  	if (test->msixnum > 0 && test->msixnum <= 2048) {
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_MSIX, test->msixnum);
> -		fprintf(stdout, "MSI-X%d:\t\t", test->msixnum);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "MSI-X%u:\t\t", test->msixnum);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
>  		else
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  		if (test->use_dma)
>  			param.flags = PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA;
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_WRITE, &param);
> -		fprintf(stdout, "WRITE (%7ld bytes):\t\t", test->size);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "WRITE (%7lu bytes):\t\t", test->size);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
>  		else
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  		if (test->use_dma)
>  			param.flags = PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA;
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_READ, &param);
> -		fprintf(stdout, "READ (%7ld bytes):\t\t", test->size);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "READ (%7lu bytes):\t\t", test->size);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
>  		else
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  		if (test->use_dma)
>  			param.flags = PCITEST_FLAGS_USE_DMA;
>  		ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_COPY, &param);
> -		fprintf(stdout, "COPY (%7ld bytes):\t\t", test->size);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "COPY (%7lu bytes):\t\t", test->size);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n");
>  		else
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
> 
>