lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zz5F4JQVxA/AgNva@uva.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:26:08 -0500
From: Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <mgonellabolduc@...onoff.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <m.gonella.bolduc@...il.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
	Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: Add APDS9160 binding

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 06:23:11PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/11/2024 18:18, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 03:36:56PM -0500, Mikael Gonella-Bolduc via B4 Relay wrote:
> >> From: Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <mgonellabolduc@...onoff.com>
> >>
> >> Add device tree bindings for APDS9160 driver
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <mgonellabolduc@...onoff.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../bindings/iio/light/avago,apds9160.yaml         | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/avago,apds9160.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/avago,apds9160.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12e196b297fe523e4d324156041ef9c6900676eb
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/avago,apds9160.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> +---
> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/light/avago,apds9160.yaml#
> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +title: Broadcom Combined Proximity & Ambient light sensor
> >> +
> >> +maintainers:
> >> +  - Mikael Gonella-Bolduc <m.gonella.bolduc@...il.com>
> >> +
> >> +description: |
> >> +  Datasheet: https://docs.broadcom.com/docs/APDS-9160-003-DS
> >> +
> >> +properties:
> >> +  compatible:
> >> +    enum:
> >> +      - avago,apds9160
> >> +      - broadmobi,apds9160
> > 
> > What is the difference between these two devices? There's no match data,
> > makes it seem like there should be a fallback going on here.
> Same device names suggest this is some legacy. We don't take new
> bindings for legacy stuff.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi,
Thank you for the feedback.

There's no difference between these two devices, it's the same chip using two different names.
There's two names because the chip was first released before the Avago & Broadcom acquisition.

The datasheet available has the avago name in it and it's referenced using both names.
I did not know which name to include so I wrote both.

It's old but still being produced today and active for new designs.

Is it too old for the driver to be mainlined?
If not, which name should I use?

Best regards,
Mikael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ