lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241120234759.GA3707860@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:47:59 -0800
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        jack@...e.cz, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "conduct@...nel.org" <conduct@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Shuah, would you be willing to entertain the notion of modifying your...

Kent, I'd like to gently remind you that Shuah is not speaking in her
personal capacity, but as a representative of the Code of Conduct
Committee[1], as she has noted in her signature.  The Code of Conduct
Committee is appointed by, and reports to, the TAB[2], which is an
elected body composed of kernel developers and maintainers.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/code-of-conduct.html
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.html

Speaking purely in a personal capacity, and not as a member of the TAB
(although I do serve as vice-chair of that body) I am extremely
grateful of the work of Shuah and her colleages (listed in [1]).  I
believe that their work is important in terms of establishing guard
rails regarding the minimum standards of behavior in our community.

If you look at the git history of the kernel sources, you will see
that a large number of your fellow maintainers assented to this
approach --- for example by providing their Acked-by in commit
1279dbeed36f ("Code of Conduct Interpretation: Add document explaining
how the Code of Conduct is to be interpreted").

Best regards,

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ