lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241120070609.u2nzofwnupyqnjqp@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:36:09 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
	quic_nainmeht@...cinc.com, quic_laksd@...cinc.com,
	quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix onfi param page read

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:50:58PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> For QPIC V2 onwards there is a separate register to read
> last code word "QPIC_NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n".
> 
> qcom_param_page_type_exec() is used to read only one code word
> If we will configure number of code words to 1 in QPIC_NAND_DEV0_CFG0

No 'we' in commit message. Also use imperative tone.

> register then QPIC controller thinks its reading the last code word,
> since we are having separate register to read the last code word,
> we have to configure "QPIC_NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n" register
> to fetch data from QPIC buffer to system memory.
> 
> Also there is minimum size to fetch the data from device to QPIC buffer
> is 512-bytes. If size is less than 512-bytes the data will not be
> protected by ECC as per QPIC standard. So while reading onfi parameter
> page from NAND device setting nandc->buf_count = 512.
> 

This is a separate fix and should be in a separate patch.

> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")

Please describe the impact of the issue. Add relevant failure messages, affected
SoC names etc...

Finally, you should also CC stable list to backport the fixes.

- Mani

> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 34ee8555fb8a..6487f2126833 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2859,7 +2859,12 @@ static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, reg_base;
> +
> +	reg_base = NAND_READ_LOCATION_0;
> +
> +	if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		reg_base = NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0;
>  
>  	ret = qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -2911,14 +2916,17 @@ static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_
>  	op_id = q_op.data_instr_idx;
>  	len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
>  
> -	nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, len, 1);
> +	if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		nandc_set_read_loc_last(chip, reg_base, 0, len, 1);
> +	else
> +		nandc_set_read_loc_first(chip, reg_base, 0, len, 1);
>  
>  	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD1, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>  	}
>  
> -	nandc->buf_count = len;
> +	nandc->buf_count = 512;
>  	memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);
>  
>  	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ