[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9896a38f-4b68-46a9-83b8-bf76abea47ba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:48:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@...il.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...rgebyte.com>,
Ben Gardner <bgardner@...tec.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: w1: ds2482: Add vcc-supply property
On 20/11/2024 09:34, Kryštof Černý wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Kryštof Černý via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Adds the newly added vcc-supply property to bindings.
>>
>> This commit message is a circular argument. You're adding it to the
>> binding, which of course means it is newly added.
>
> You are right, I will replace with "Adds the vcc-supply property to
> bindings." in the next version.
No, please say why, e.g. because it was missing and device has it
according to datasheet.
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/maxim,ds2482.yaml | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/maxim,ds2482.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/maxim,ds2482.yaml
>>> index 422becc6e1fa8d58665c5586ebdc611cd0b2c760..a6b9e0658ec858cb24b21cf64443a061bb43e4ef 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/maxim,ds2482.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/maxim,ds2482.yaml
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ properties:
>>> reg:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>>
>>> + vcc-supply:
>>> + description: phandle of the regulator that provides the supply voltage.
>>
>> "vcc-supply: true" should suffice.
>>
>
> Right, I suppose you mean to remove the description and just have
> "vcc-supply: true".
> If so, could you explain why no description? Is it some standard property
> or because the name is self-explanatory? If you mean to keep both,
> please reply.
It's almost self-explanatory and your description does not give any more
information. git grep for existing code - you will find also examples
which give actual information, e.g. detailed PIN name and accepted voltages.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists