[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <274yn2xnep6hblxecoe3zm7tssj37pqwiyjwrscrweowtqhm6j@hiywf65q32nr>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:06:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, dharma.b@...rochip.com,
mihai.sain@...rochip.com, romain.sioen@...rochip.com, varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] clk: at91: clk-master: increase maximum number of
clocks
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 09:40:19AM -0700, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
>
> Increase maximum number of valid master clocks. The PMC for the SAMA7D65
> requires 9 master clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
This goes with the driver change using more clocks, no? Why this is
suitable as separate patch (without the user)?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists