[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241120-backwaren-faible-99807b4768bb@brauner>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:18:50 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] timers/core for v6.13-rc1
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:33:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 11:22, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
>
> > - Core infrastructure for VFS multigrain timestamping
> >
> > This is required to allow the kernel to use coarse grained time stamps
> > by default and switch to fine grained time stamps when inode attributes
> > are actively observed via getattr().
> >
> > These changes have been provided to the VFS tree as well, so that the
> > VFS specific infrastructure could be built on top.
>
> Bah. Except the vfs tree didn't take it as a shared branch, but
> instead cherry-picked the commits and as a result they are duplicate
> and caused a (trivial) merge conflict.
Wait, I'm confused. I definitely pulled that branch the day after Thomas
gave it to me and in my vfs.mgtime branch I clearly see:
commit d7c898a73f875bd205df53074c1d542766171da1
Merge: 8cf0b93919e1 2a15385742c6
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 7 12:47:19 2024 +0200
Commit: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu Oct 10 10:20:57 2024 +0200
Merge tag 'timers-core-for-vfs' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip into vfs.mgtime
Timekeeping interfaces for consumption by the VFS tree.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Unless I did something odd during the pull?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists