lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zz3vdkEzSobJ54bI@x13>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:17:26 -0500
From: Luis Felipe Hernandez <luis.hernandez093@...il.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"rbm@...e.com" <rbm@...e.com>,
	"skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" <linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: remove unused sg struct member

Thanks, Thinh and Greg, for the feedback!

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:19:09PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Previously, this patch addressed a documentation warning caused by the
> 
> Remove this paragraph. This context only makes sense in this thread
> where the previous patch version is visible.
> 

I’ll update the commit message and remove the unnecessary paragraph as suggested.

> > Reported-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
> 
> I'm not the one who should be attributed to by the Reported-by tag.
> 
> I think Greg was alluding to this report by Stephen Rothwell:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241118194006.77c7b126@canb.auug.org.au/
> 
> It wasn't Cc to the linux-usb list, so I'm not sure if you've seen it.
> If your change was base on the report above, then you can update the
> Reported-by tag accordingly.
> 

Regarding the report by Stephen Rothwell, I wasn’t aware of it before. I found the warning independently while trying to compile the Documentation subsystem, looking for bugs to address.

That said, now that I’m aware of Stephen’s thread, I wouldn’t mind updating the commit message to include a reference to it if you think it would help link the two discussions. Let me know your thoughts on this.

Thanks again for the clarification and the reviews!

Best,

Felipe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ