lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07b133f5-4352-4c1a-bbc9-d1e881c96781@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:09:02 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: syzbot <syzbot+cc36d44ec9f368e443d3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
 asml.silence@...il.com, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [io-uring?] WARNING in __io_uring_free

On 11/18/24 9:38 PM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    cfaaa7d010d1 Merge tag 'net-6.12-rc8' of git://git.kernel...
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13005cc0580000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d2aeec8c0b2e420c
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cc36d44ec9f368e443d3
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-cfaaa7d0.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/63eae0d3e67f/vmlinux-cfaaa7d0.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6495d9e4ddee/bzImage-cfaaa7d0.xz
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+cc36d44ec9f368e443d3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at io_uring/tctx.c:51 __io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00125-gcfaaa7d010d1 #0
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:__io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51
> Code: 80 7c 25 00 00 74 08 4c 89 f7 e8 a1 8a 49 fd 49 c7 06 00 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc e8 37 ad df fc 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 6a ff ff ff e8 29 ad df fc 90 0f 0b 90 eb 84 e8 1e ad
> RSP: 0018:ffffc900004279b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: ffffffff84b53cd9 RBX: ffff88804fc3b8e0 RCX: ffff88801b7e8000
> RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88801f058000
> RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffffff8154d881 R09: 1ffff11003e0b005
> R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed1003e0b006 R12: dffffc0000000000
> R13: 1ffff11003e0b120 R14: ffff88801f058900 R15: ffff88804fc3b800
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88801fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00005594393ad338 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  io_uring_free include/linux/io_uring.h:31 [inline]
>  __put_task_struct+0xd5/0x290 kernel/fork.c:975
>  put_task_struct include/linux/sched/task.h:144 [inline]
>  delayed_put_task_struct+0x125/0x300 kernel/exit.c:228
>  rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2567 [inline]
>  rcu_core+0xaaa/0x17a0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2823
>  handle_softirqs+0x2c5/0x980 kernel/softirq.c:554
>  run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:927
>  smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164
>  kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>  </TASK>

I had to click the report to see that it's using forced memory failure
allocations to trigger this. But with that in mind, I still didn't see
what the issue was. I guess I'll take a look when a reproducer exists,
but don't think there's much afoul here due to the usage of fault
injection.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ