linux-kernel - Re: [Plucky/Unstable PATCH 0/2] Avoid arch-dependent source package (step 1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ0jQVwaWS1b9ZsjrA100vASdfAiau80QO4J64mwEc74Zw+SSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:24:00 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiro.yamada@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Plucky/Unstable PATCH 0/2] Avoid arch-dependent source package
 (step 1)

Please ignore this email, as it is unrelated to LKML.
(I accidentally added incorrect CC due to my tooling mistake.)
Sorry for the noise.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:12 AM Masahiro Yamada
<masahiro.yamada@...onical.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ubuntu kernel produces a different source package
> depending on the architecture of your build machine.
>
> I tried to resolve this issue in the previous hackathon last year,
> but the patch set was not merged.
> I am resending my patches with smaller chunks.
>
> 1/2 solves one issue that can potentially produces
> a source package that depends on your build machine architecture.
>
> 2/2 is a trivial clean-up.
>
>
>
> Masahiro Yamada (2):
>   UBUNTU: [Packaging] Avoid Arch-Specific Certificate Creation
>   UBUNTU: [Packaging] remove unneeded prerequisites of
>     $(DEBIAN)/control.stub
>
>  debian/rules | 12 +++---------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>