linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DM6PR04MB6575EEC76CE7536BC97829CCFC222@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 20:50:32 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, "Martin K . Petersen"
	<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Bean Huo
	<beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new
 clock_gating lock

> Hi Avri,
> 
> I see two changes in this patch: introduction of the function
> ufshcd_has_pending_tasks() and removal of hba->clk_gating.active_reqs from
> ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(). Shouldn't this patch be split into two patches -
> one patch per change?
Done.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.