linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/msm: adreno: move features bits in a separate variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ch7vrgkjnhabjdw53l3tjqv4p7oyfcfsgctlfb7gxpm5qiqs6k@5vkjha5jkfy6>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:26:31 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/msm: adreno: move features bits in a
 separate variable

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:48:28AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:44 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:54:24AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:18 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > > <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > Now the features defines have the right name, introduce a features
> > > > > bitfield and move the features defines in it, fixing all code checking
> > > > > for them.
> > > > >
> > > > > No functional changes intended.
> > > >
> > > > I think it might be better to squahs this patch into the previous one,
> > > > it would simplify checking that we use .quirks for ADRENO_QUIRK_foo and
> > > > .features for ADRENO_FEAT_bar.
> > > >
> > >
> > > IMHO better to keep this separated
> >
> > If they are separated, it is easy to overlook presense of a statement
> > checking .quirks against ADRENO_FEAT_bar.
> 
> Maybe just drop this patch.. we don't really have so many
> quirks+features so a single bitmask is fine and avoids this
> wrong-bitmask-problem in the first place.

SGTM too.

> 
> BR,
> -R
> 
> > >
> > > But we don't have _that_ many features/quirks so I don't find
> > > combining them all that problematic
> > >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry