[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc76ccab-e1b3-4dc6-8652-3a26146b37ad@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:36:02 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss binding
On 21/11/2024 00:37, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 11/21/24 01:27, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 20/11/2024 23:02, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> like "vdd-csiphy-0p9-supply" and "vdd-csiphy-1p2-supply"?
>>
>> In theory, however I'd like to avoid adding endless strings of new names
>> into the driver code for each different power input.
>
> I don't understand this argument, it's the same degree of endlessness as
> the endlessness of new designed SoCs. Should it be stopped now or what's
> the point here?
I mean to say, I don't want to backdoor a bunch of optional regulators
with odd names via this method.
Per our previous disucssions/agreements we will do this in a real PHY
instead of inline in CAMSS.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists