lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94663eed-e5a7-4263-ab96-bf16fa94eb58@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:31:21 +0800
From: guanjing <guanjing@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
 mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
 mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
 irogers@...gle.com, algonell@...il.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf intel-pt: cleanup unneeded return variable
 inintel_pt_text_poke()

Thank you for clarifying the proper usage of the Fixes tag. I understand 
now that it should only be applied when there is an actual fix to 
functionality. I will ensure to use it correctly in future submissions.

Thanks a lot!

On 2024/11/21 18:18, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/11/24 12:00, guanjing wrote:
>> Removed Unneeded variable: "ret"
>>
>> Fixes: 0dd5041c9a0e ("perf addr_location: Add init/exit/copy functions")
> A Fixes tag is not for patches that don't fix some functionality.
>
>> Signed-off-by: guanjing <guanjing@...s.chinamobile.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> index 30be6dfe09eb..6c0234acc669 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> @@ -3402,7 +3402,6 @@ static int intel_pt_text_poke(struct intel_pt *pt, union perf_event *event)
>>   	struct machine *machine = pt->machine;
>>   	struct intel_pt_cache_entry *e;
>>   	u64 offset;
>> -	int ret = 0;
>>   
>>   	addr_location__init(&al);
>>   	if (!event->text_poke.new_len)
>> @@ -3443,7 +3442,7 @@ static int intel_pt_text_poke(struct intel_pt *pt, union perf_event *event)
>>   	}
>>   out:
>>   	addr_location__exit(&al);
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return 0;
> Should just drop the return value entirely, since it is
> always zero.
>
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int intel_pt_process_event(struct perf_session *session,



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ