[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6434853a-4df4-d3c4-14b9-a0d4ad599602@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:01:34 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Christian Theune <ct@...ingcircus.io>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>, Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@...os.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, song@...nel.org,
xni@...hat.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
Florian-Ewald Müller <florian-ewald.mueller@...os.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH md-6.13 4/5] md/raid5: implement pers->bitmap_sector()
Hi,
在 2024/11/21 17:30, Christian Theune 写道:
> Hi,
>
>> On 21. Nov 2024, at 09:33, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2024/11/21 16:10, Jinpu Wang 写道:
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kuai,
>>>>
>>>> We will test on our side and report back.
>>> Hi Kuai,
>>> Haris tested the new patchset, and it works fine.
>>> Thanks for the work.
>>
>> Thanks for the test! And just to be sure, the BUG_ON() problem in the
>> other thread is not triggered as well, right?
>>
>> +CC Christian
>>
>> Are you able to test this set for lastest kernel?
>
> I have scheduled testing for later today. My current plan was to try Xiao Ni’s fix on 6.6 as that did fix it on 6.11 for me.
>
> Which way forward makes more sense now? Are those two patches independent or amalgamated or might they be stepping on each others’ toes?
Our plan is to apply this set to latest kernel first, and then backport
this to older kernel. Xiao's fix will not be considered. :(
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Christian
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists