linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: add support for QCA6698AQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8734jkyhhp.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:05:22 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
Cc: Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@...cinc.com>,  <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>,
  <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,  <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: add support for QCA6698AQ

Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> writes:

> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> writes:
>
>> On 10/30/2024 5:05 PM, Miaoqing Pan wrote:
>>> QCA6698AQ IP core is the same as WCN6855 hw2.1, they share the same
>>> PCI device ID, the same major and minor version numbers, the same
>>> register address, and same HAL descriptors, etc. The most significant
>>> difference is that QCA6698AQ has different RF, IPA, thermal, etc.
>>> 
>>> Follow the approach done in commit 5dc9d1a55e95 ("wifi: ath11k: add
>>> support for QCA2066"), enumerate the subversion number to identify the
>>> specific card.
>>> 
>>> Tested-on: QCA6698AQ hw2.1 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-04479-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_IOE-1
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Am I correct that this satisfies at least a subset of the devices you were
>> trying to support with the following?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024002514.92290-1-quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com/
>>
>> If so, can you reply to that thread, pointing to this new patch, and elaborate
>> on what is now supported and what still requires ath11k to support
>> board-specific firmware overrides?
>
> That question is still open but otherwise this patch looks good to me.
> But I'll give an Acked-by only after I understand what's that "NFA765
> m.2 card for IoT platforms" mentioned in the other thread is.

Miaoqing provided the info offlist so:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches