lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241121113058.GA394828@pauld.westford.csb>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 06:30:58 -0500
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
	Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Ramanan Govindarajan <ramanan.govindarajan@...cle.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	Paul Webb <paul.x.webb@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug-report] 5-9% FIO randomwrite ext4 perf regression on 6.12.y
 kernel


Hi,

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 06:20:12PM -0700 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/24 5:00 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> > On 11/20/24 13:35, Saeed Mirzamohammadi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I?m reporting a performance regression of up to 9-10% with FIO randomwrite benchmark on ext4 comparing 6.12.0-rc2 kernel and v5.15.161. Also, standard deviation after this change grows up to 5-6%.
> >>
> >> Bisect root cause commit
> >> ===================
> >> - commit 63dfa1004322 ("nvme: move NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES out of nvme_config_discard?)
> >>
> >>
> >> Test details
> >> =========
> >> - readwrite=randwrite bs=4k size=1G ioengine=libaio iodepth=16 direct=1 time_based=1 ramp_time=180 runtime=1800 randrepeat=1 gtod_reduce=1
> >> - Test is on ext4 filesystem
> >> - System has 4 NVMe disks
> >>
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for the report, to narrow down this problem can you
> > please :-
> > 
> > 1. Run the same test on the raw nvme device /dev/nvme0n1 that you
> >     have used for this benchmark ?
> > 2. Run the same test on the  XFS formatted nvme device instead of ext4 ?
> > 
> > This way we will know if there is an issue only with the ext4 or
> > with other file systems are suffering from this problem too or
> > it is below the file system layer such as block layer and nvme pci driver ?
> > 
> > It will also help if you can repeat these numbers for io_uring fio io_engine
> > to narrow down this problem to know if the issue is ioengine specific.
> > 
> > Looking at the commit [1], it only sets the max value to write zeroes 
> > sectors
> > if NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES is set, else uses the controller max
> > write zeroes value.
> 
> There's no way that commit is involved, the test as quoted doesn't even
> touch write zeroes. Hence if there really is a regression here, then
> it's either not easily bisectable, some error was injected while
> bisecting, or the test itself is bimodal.

I was just going to ask how confident we are in that bisect result.

I suspect this is the same issue I've been fighting here:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241101124715.GA689589@pauld.westford.csb/

Saeed, can you try your randwrite test after

  "echo NO_DELAY_DEQUEUE > /sys/kernel/debug/sched/features"

please?

We don't as yet have a general fix for it as it seems to be a bit of
a trade off.


Cheers,
Phil

> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 

-- 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ