Message-ID: <673f2511.050a0220.3c9d61.016e.GAE@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 04:18:25 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+355da3b3a74881008e8f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	shaggy@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [jfs?] possible deadlock in diFree (2)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    4a5df3796467 Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2024-11-16-15-3..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17315378580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=95b7d4b29182ed62
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=355da3b3a74881008e8f
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15d4db5f980000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10bef130580000

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-4a5df379.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/cb509a18129b/vmlinux-4a5df379.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4a4deaeedf54/bzImage-4a5df379.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/041539d17a26/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+355da3b3a74881008e8f@...kaller.appspotmail.com

ERROR: (device loop0): remounting filesystem as read-only
ERROR: (device loop0): duplicateIXtree: 
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index]));
  lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index]));

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309:
 #0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515
 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline]
 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026
 #2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630
 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline]
 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669
 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline]
 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891
 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889
 jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156
 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
 diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline]
 duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022
 diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline]
 diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
 diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669
 diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590
 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
 vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline]
 __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline]
 __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fc96b45f879
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 61 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffca87793b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000102
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffca8779588 RCX: 00007fc96b45f879
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200005c0 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c
RBP: 00007fc96b4d9610 R08: 00007ffca8779588 R09: 00007ffca8779588
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 00007ffca8779578 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists