linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: serial: Add a new compatible string for ums9632

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zz8m8PqHX_7VzgoP@standask-GA-A55M-S2HP>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:26:24 +0100
From: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
To: wenhua.lin@...soc.com
Cc: Zhaochen.Su@...soc.com, Zhirong.Qiu@...soc.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, brgl@...ev.pl, cixi.geng@...ux.dev,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, orsonzhai@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
	wenhua.lin1994@...il.com, xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com,
	zhang.lyra@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: serial: Add a new compatible string for
 ums9632

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this patch seems incorrect to me.
The 1st patch suggets that the sc9632-uart is incompatible with sc9836-uart,
but here you make it fallback to it anyway.

Also, both of the patches seem to have made it to linux-next without the
reviews/Acks from maintainers. Maybe Greg was a bit too fast here :)

Regards,
Stanislav