linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zz9E8lYTsfrMjROi@sashalap>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:34:26 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13 merge window

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 03:07:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On 11/21/24 14:26, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 07:56:23AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 08:58:42AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>      riscv: perf: add guest vs host distinction
>>>
>>>When merging this PR into linus-next, I've started seeing build errors:
>>>
>>>Looks like this is due to 2c47e7a74f44 ("perf/core: Correct perf
>>>sampling with guest VMs") which went in couple of days ago through
>>>Ingo's perf tree and changed the number of parameters for
>>>perf_misc_flags().
>
>Thanks Sasha. :(  Looks like Stephen does not build for risc-v.

He does :)

This issue was reported[1] about a week ago in linux-next and a fix was
sent out (the one you linked to be used for conflict resolution), but it
looks like it wasn't picked up by either the perf tree or the KVM tree.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYv=qPeZKkF+ntWxUXbAKjz4gXnBM8y60C4F=YHv+jgZZw@mail.gmail.com/

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha