linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6.13-rc1] arm64: mte: set VM_MTE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <182f0f86-5d52-4fca-99de-ddde2cc39c3b@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:29:50 -0800
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.13-rc1] arm64: mte: set VM_MTE_ALLOWED for hugetlbfs at
 correct place



On 11/21/24 10:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:09:14PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> The commit 5de195060b2e ("mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path
>> behaviour") moved vm flags validation before fop->mmap for file
>> mappings.  But when commit 25c17c4b55de ("hugetlb: arm64: add mte support")
>> was rebased on top of it, the hugetlbfs part was missed.  Mmapping
>> hugetlbfs file may not have MAP_HUGETLB set.
>>
>> Fixes: 25c17c4b55de ("hugetlb: arm64: add mte support")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
> Since 5de195060b2e went into -rc7 and my arm64 tree was based on -rc1, I
> did not test this combination. The patch looks fine, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
> So I either merge it via the arm64 tree at -rc1 or Linus picks it up and
> applies it directly during the merging window. Both options are fine,
> it's not essential that MTE + hugetlbfs works at -rc1. Adding Linus and
> Andrew in case they have any preference (and leaving the patch in place
> below).

Thanks, Catalin. Either way is fine to me too.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Catalin
>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h | 3 ++-
>>   fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c          | 2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>> index 1d53022fc7e1..21df8bbd2668 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>   #ifndef BUILD_VDSO
>>   #include <linux/compiler.h>
>>   #include <linux/fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>>   #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
>>   #include <linux/types.h>
>>   
>> @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_flag_bits(struct file *file,
>>   	if (system_supports_mte()) {
>>   		if (flags & (MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB))
>>   			return VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
>> -		if (shmem_file(file))
>> +		if (shmem_file(file) || is_file_hugepages(file))
>>   			return VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
>>   	}
>>   
>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> index 1bbf783b244a..2dea122e5b93 100644
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   	 * way when do_mmap unwinds (may be important on powerpc
>>   	 * and ia64).
>>   	 */
>> -	vm_flags_set(vma, VM_HUGETLB | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_MTE_ALLOWED);
>> +	vm_flags_set(vma, VM_HUGETLB | VM_DONTEXPAND);
>>   	vma->vm_ops = &hugetlb_vm_ops;
>>   
>>   	ret = seal_check_write(info->seals, vma);
>> --