[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zz-VdwLPBUV9d_Sj@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:17:59 +0100
From: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
jack@...e.cz, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"conduct@...nel.org" <conduct@...nel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:39:09PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> There were concerns raised in the recent CoC enforcement thread, by
> someone with experience in such matters, that your aproach seemed
> extremeely heavy handed and I find myself in 100% agreement.
Ehrm ...
Yes, I did quite strongly criticize the new coc enforcement process.
No, you would not appreciate what I'd do instead, not at all.
-Sima
--
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists