[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0Dfl76DIsrmWEZ1@PC2K9PVX.TheFacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:46:31 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@...itsu.com>, Li Ming <ming4.li@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
rrichter@....com, terry.bowman@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Mem
Hole
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 04:51:51PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure (CFMWS) describes zero or more Host
> Physical Address (HPA) windows that are associated with each CXL Host
> Bridge. Each window represents a contiguous HPA that may be interleaved
> with one or more targets (CXL v3.1 - 9.18.1.3).
>
> The Low Memory Hole (LMH) of x86 is a range of addresses of physical low
> memory to which systems cannot send transactions. On those systems, BIOS
> publishes CFMWS which communicate the active System Physical Address (SPA)
> ranges that map to a subset of the Host Physical Address (HPA) ranges. The
> SPA range trims out the hole, and capacity in the endpoint is lost with no
> SPA to map to CXL HPA in that hole.
>
> In the early stages of CXL Regions construction and attach on platforms
> with Low Memory Holes, the driver fails and returns an error because it
> expects that the CXL Endpoint Decoder range is a subset of the Root
> Decoder's.
>
> Then detect SPA/HPA misalignment and allow CXL Regions construction and
> attach if and only if the misalignment is due to x86 Low Memory Holes.
+cc Robert Richter and Terry Bowman
This is not the only memory-hole possibility. We may need something
more robust, rather than optimizing for a single memory hole solution.
Robert and Terry may have some additional context here.
~Gregory
>
> - Patch 1/3 changes the calling conventions of three match_*_by_range()
> helpers in preparation of 2/3.
> - Patch 2/3 detects x86 LMH and enables CXL Regions construction and
> attach by trimming HPA by SPA.
> - Patch 3/3 simulates a LMH for running the CXL tests on patched driver.
>
> Many thanks to Alison, Dan, and Ira for their help and for their reviews
> of my RFC on Intel's internal ML.
>
> Fabio M. De Francesco (3):
> cxl/core: Change match_*_by_range() calling convention
> cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Memory Hole
> cxl/test: Simulate an x86 Low Memory Hole for tests
>
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 5 +++
> drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 32 +++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c | 4 +-
> 7 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c
>
> --
> 2.46.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists