[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878qtbyrgq.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:54:29 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@....com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, David Wang <00107082@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a potential abuse of seq_printf() format string in
drivers
On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 13:30, David Wang wrote:
> Using device name as format string of seq_printf() is proned to
> "Format string attack", opens possibility for exploitation.
> Seq_puts() is safer and more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-hlwd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xgs-iproc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-pic.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c | 2 +-
Can you please split these patches per subsystem (gpio, irqchip,
pinctrl) so that the respective maintainers can pick them up
individually?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists