[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5HtG+6D8245DFAeSKfGL75zVkEGLu74=hqtjX=-Dpj70Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:36:14 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] delay: Fix ndelay() spuriously treated as udelay()
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:30 PM Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> A recent rework on delay functions wrongly ended up calling __udelay()
> instead of __ndelay() for nanosecond delays, increasing those by 1000.
>
> As a result hangs have been observed on boot
>
> Restore the right function calls.
>
> Fixes: 19e2d91d8cb1 ("delay: Rework udelay and ndelay")
> Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Thank you for the quick response! This fixed things for me.
> ---
> include/asm-generic/delay.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/delay.h b/include/asm-generic/delay.h
> index 76cf237b6e4c..03b0ec7afca6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/delay.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/delay.h
> @@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ static __always_inline void ndelay(unsigned long nsec)
> {
> if (__builtin_constant_p(nsec)) {
> if (nsec >= DELAY_CONST_MAX)
> - __bad_udelay();
> + __bad_ndelay();
> else
> __const_udelay(nsec * NDELAY_CONST_MULT);
> } else {
> - __udelay(nsec);
> + __ndelay(nsec);
> }
> }
> #define ndelay(x) ndelay(x)
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists