linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhSdy29hLvyetBa_LsegiBqvVAaDf92b5ZPUD=okNBSTLjdxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:10:45 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13 merge window

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:49 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/21/24 15:34, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 03:07:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 11/21/24 14:26, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 07:56:23AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >>>> Hi Paolo,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 08:58:42AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>>>      riscv: perf: add guest vs host distinction
> >>>>
> >>>> When merging this PR into linus-next, I've started seeing build errors:
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like this is due to 2c47e7a74f44 ("perf/core: Correct perf
> >>>> sampling with guest VMs") which went in couple of days ago through
> >>>> Ingo's perf tree and changed the number of parameters for
> >>>> perf_misc_flags().
> >>
> >> Thanks Sasha. :(  Looks like Stephen does not build for risc-v.
> >
> > He does :)
> >
> > This issue was reported[1] about a week ago in linux-next
>
> Yeah, that's Linaro not Stephen.
>
> > and a fix was
> > sent out (the one you linked to be used for conflict resolution), but it
> > looks like it wasn't picked up by either the perf tree or the KVM tree.
>
> Yeah, that's not surprising. :(  Neither KVM nor I weren't CC'd on
> either the report or the bugfix; and the perf tree didn't have the code
> at all as Ingo pointed out
> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZzxDvLKGz1ouWzgX@gmail.com/).  Anup was
> CC'd on the bugfix but he must have missed too and didn't notify me.
>

Sorry, I totally missed this one.

I generally rely on linux-next to report cross-tree conflicts or issues
but this one was somehow not reported.

Let me know if you need any action from my side.

Regards,
Anup