[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e96ed0ee-01c8-4429-a903-17bc7813d78a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:25:33 +0800
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com, naveen@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, mark.rutland@....com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: hotplug: Add a generic RAS tracepoint for hotplug
event
在 2024/11/22 08:08, Steven Rostedt 写道:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:09:50 +0100
> Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
>
>> Would something like
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/pci/hotplug_event
>>
>> be possible? It would seem more elegant than
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/pci/pci_hp_event
>>
>> because it avoids the duplication of "pci" in the path.
>
> Most events have the name of the system in it (see the sched events).
> That's to prevent the duplicates in other places. Also, in the trace
> output, only the event name is shown and not the system. That is, if you
> have more than one "hotplug_event" enabled, the trace will not
> differentiate them.
>
> My suggestion is the "pci_hp_event" as it will be more obvious in the trace
> output.
>
> -- Steve
Agreed. pci_hp_event is more reasonable. Than is:
- system: pci
- event: pci_hp_event
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/pci/pci_hp_event
@Lukas, if you have any other concerns, please let me know.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Shuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists