[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241121223509.a77731933dd7fb3e1728eacc@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:35:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_task_exe_file: check PF_KTHREAD locklessly
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:35:26 +0100 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com> wrote:
> Same thing as 8ac5dc66599c ("get_task_mm: check PF_KTHREAD lockless")
We prefer that patches have fuller changelogs, please.
I copied the 8ac5dc66599c changelog text into this patch's changelog.
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: get_task_exe_file: check PF_KTHREAD locklessly
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:35:26 +0100
Same thing as 8ac5dc66599c ("get_task_mm: check PF_KTHREAD lockless")
Nowadays PF_KTHREAD is sticky and it was never protected by ->alloc_lock.
Move the PF_KTHREAD check outside of task_lock() section to make this code
more understandable.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119143526.704986-1-mjguzik@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/fork.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/fork.c~get_task_exe_file-check-pf_kthread-locklessly
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1496,12 +1496,13 @@ struct file *get_task_exe_file(struct ta
struct file *exe_file = NULL;
struct mm_struct *mm;
+ if (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
+ return NULL;
+
task_lock(task);
mm = task->mm;
- if (mm) {
- if (!(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
- exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(mm);
- }
+ if (mm)
+ exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(mm);
task_unlock(task);
return exe_file;
}
_
Powered by blists - more mailing lists